Saturday, December 27

a great experiment in public art intervention

Thursday, June 12

cross posted from http://indersalim.livejournal.com/49539.html?view=8323#t8323

theblackyellowarrow.blogspot.com wrote:
Jun. 13th, 2008 06:17 am (UTC)
ethics and art
hi inder,his is to formally share by my extreme discomfort in the manner 'Mochi-ki-Dukan, ART AUCTION in support of Suraj & his family' was conceived and executed. more so because you said (in a private conversation) that since this work was towards charity, it should not be criticized. in that case inder no ngo will be up for critical scrutiny. among many at pallete that day i saw extreme discomfort on the faces of suraj and his wife as they were glared at and introduced in an alien st up. this is some thing you have refused to recognize, and i dont blame you cause you never ever bother to look at them.
your project would have been stronger if either you had the artistic capacity to take us there..to their house. serve chai, samosa and get us to spend. it might be even stronger if you had done a photography workshop with the family, and sold their prints to raise money form them. but such long involved process is not the nature of your work.what you did amounted to treating them like beggars. you made them into beggars.in the city's performance art circuit you are a stalwart. works of far greater merit are expected from you. specially since the platform was so large.if you indeed want to work with the public, i suggest you read Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, edited by Suzanne Lacy.
regards

Monday, June 9

Re thinking the curation: Can Be Done In Any Corner You Like

Sometime during Shantanu Lodhs performance in front of the ‘british high commission’, and a conversation with Pratul Dash, certain conceptual loopholes in the project came to the fore, and it became clear that the curation had to be re thought and re positioned. One of the very important critiques that surfaced was that a curation coming from a reading of how the growing appropriation within the visual arts discourse had affected the concept metaphor called performance art; especially at a point when the visual art discourse in India is being swept over by the neo lib idea of the spectacle and this is having a profound impact on how an event as a marketing tool is being understood and practiced. Nonetheless the mode in which the curation was conceived was a three day event. Everything said and done the fundamental structural mistake happened there. 'Can Be Done in Any Corner you Like' went on to emphasize the dominant understand of curation as an event generating field rather than a discourse generating arena. If one had to allow for this criticism to shape the future of this curatorial project, then the project had to be re thought…re worked.

‘Can Be Done In Any Corner you Like’ is now positioned as an ongoing curatorial space which works at two levels. The blog (Can It Be Done in Any Corner You Like?), is positioned as a space for proposing and ideating, and also as the domain through which the documentation of the performances is shared and the text generates as the discursive context in which the documentation is embedded.

Planned, sporadic bursts of extensive poster campaign will be used to open up the project in terms of artists and viewers. There will no longer be an invited list of artists, instead the project offers itself as an curatorial platform for anyone who wants to do performance in non institutional/unprotected spaces in the re thinking the discourse. The project continues to be based in the imagined city of Delhi.

A formalized three member team is being put in place which maintains the blog, interacts with artists, ideates documents and fund raises. The artists participating in the project formulate a larger body which guides and works with the team. At this point certain features of the curation have been re instated after a lot of discussions with the prospective team and artists.

This remains a curatorial experiment which seeks to explore possibilities for creating art outside institutional support and spaces. We believe that there is an array of available spaces and agencies who can make such a venture possible (or impossible) but in order to locate re-think contemporary notions of curation one needs to engage with these possibilities. At a time when the alternative has either been forsaken or appropriated the project will seek to work with non mainstream modes of propagating, distributing and supporting itself. The blog is in a way the soul of the project, a site that makes the project completely transparent in terms of ideating, organizing funds and spending. The project itself will walk on the edge of being and not being an institution in a search to know whether such a space is yet possible.

There is a strong realization that contemporary culture supports a wide array of performance practices, and as we work with wider array of artists the focus should not be on the end product, the performance itself. Curatorially a deeper engagement with process is important. The failure of a performance to happen (either through negotiations within the site falling apart or due to ideological disagreements), is not a cause of lament if the process is documented and transparent.

In the spirit of de personalising this project and slowly handing it over to a team, the blog ulr has been changed fromhttp://www.ganjabengali.blogspot.com/ to www.theblackyellowarrow.blogspot.com , and the design of the blog has been completely re thought. The blog is the forum for random thoughts, demented mind and anyone interested in alternative curatorial and artistic practice. Short notes, large comments, essays cross posting are welcome. There are no administrative rights as such, who ever wants can come in and change things around.

Vibha's work

last time one ideated with vibha, she had a very clear idea of what she wanted to do. her work is theorised, but as an artist she is yet to find confidence in using her body as an medium of expression. she has been on the edge for sometime now

Mithu Sen's performance


the first letter


the second letter

these two letters (they enlarge and become readable if you click on them) summaries our attempts to put in place Mithu sens performance at the india gate. in between mithu and i had an exchange regarding police permissions vis-a-vis on site negotiations.
learnt (much later) that, the permission was denied the second time around cause 1st may was considered way too much a sensitive day.
need to follow this up urgently.

Sunday, April 6

a much deffered post

February 28, 2008
Delhi-based performing artist of Iraqi origin Al Saidi Hassan, performed ADAM FEET, during a group exhibition of various artist at Anant Art Center, Noida on February 16, 2008. Curated by Marta Jakimowicz, the exhibition was entitled as “The Mechanism of Motion”.


photo credit - artmaharaj

In ADAM FEET, Al Saidi Hassan tried to raise issues of fragility, hostility and vulnerability related to the Freedom in Art in the contemporary Art scenario that prevails in post-colonial India. The performance was aimed at challenging the growing intolerance for the diversity of positions on a particular issue, even in the circles of the artists.

Using the performance as a medium of expression, Al Saidi, a member of the Progressive Artists Group, made an effort to articulate the concerns of those artists who are kept at margins and who often go unheard. It also asserts the right of artists to live a life characterized with dignity, equality and justice.

After being forced to conform orders of ‘the other’ and also being denied the right to air his voice as he desired, Al Saidi, the rebellious artist, decided to make his own contribution to the Art Freedom, in support of M.F.Hussain episode. .

Al Saidi removed his shoes and then entered Anant Gallery, walking on the black- grey Rajsthani stone pavement; he stopped standing in front of many cameras which were fixed on his naked feet; then he was asked to draw with black markers, both of his feet and put his name and signature there. Then he was asked to repeat the same procedure with regard to the second step. He was further asked to do the same, making it as bigger as the ADAM FEET, in a prepared sketch book but was not allowed to do more than what was ordered. Al Saidi found the whole exercise very boring and repeated the phrase around the outline of his drawn feet: For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain, For M.F.Hussain… Finally, he was asked to come on the microphone and pronounce his name. He was not permitted to utter a single word except that. It was followed by the order: “Please Take Your Shoe and Go Back to your Place”.

For Al Saidi, the lack of freedom at the Vivian Sundram Documentary Interact Performance made the latter a clone of: ‘The US Artist Fantasy in Vivian Artistic Philosophy’, designed to rule the scenario in the exhibition. “I am a comedian target and was forced to join Action against another comedian, in taking side with self-censorship by removing my drawing from the sketchbook. Thus, I am always ready to give the M.F.Hussain case an embrace even though he enjoys security in the Arabia Filics (Dubai)and have “Al Dorado Life Style” as a refugee in exile while there is nobody to protect me or support me in my struggle for my survival as an artist in India, says the Iraqi artist. He further describes the Interactive Vivan Performance as “unfortunate” because it did not allow him to give a free opinion in support of Hussain.

Through the ADAM FEET, Al Saidi made the point that it was drawings and names of artists which lent a colour of sacredness to the Vivian Sketch Book. By the same logic, he questions what was being practiced at the Vivan Performance as it also tantamount to denying the artists the freedom and space to express in the way they wanted.

As there is no public explanation; I feel no safe to my work in his hand. Also, I do not know to which collector or European Museum our work he will sell to; which is different from drawing my feet on the gallery pavement; and I found it genuinely valid as no one can carry the pavement with him-only Saddam Hussain during the 1992 Kuwait invasion.

“I felt in peace in ADAM FEET performance because it symbolised origin of us all, and also because my performance was not motivated by any politico-capital interest”, says Al Saidi. A colonial mindset seems to lurk beneath the contemporary Indian art culture. He accuses the mindset to try to keep ‘others’ silent in. He wonders that such praxis are still in vogue despite the fact that all of us come into existence as a result of the multiple of intermixing among origins, ethnicities, races and classes.

Al Saidi said on the occasion: “I know what I am doing. I am not stealing or confusing art. Though my idiom is different, I also am protesting and in the process, I am not masking action or manipulating the motivation, to communicate a higher truth, regarding the conceptual bankruptcy of the political culture and ideology”. He is of the opinion that it is this Racist Culture which is instrumental in perpetuating bad living condition of many artists who are left on the margin of galleries as they do get hardly get someone to buy their artworks. Ironically, it coincides with the boom in the domestic market.

Al Saidi’s anger as symbolized in ADAM FEET heightens the sense of survival crisis which pervades the circle of non-elite artists. Is it sane in this backdrop to hold only the Political Right responsible for incidents which bear similarity to the Hussain episode? One should recall justice for the trauma; the fundamental purpose of ADAM FEET.

Thursday, April 3

jenson's performance 30th march

we met in front of the akshardham temple, the famous religio-tourist site that dominates the land with its carefully manicured monstrosity. the site is uncer ecological and cultural dispute with issues of river bed development, displacement and ecological violation stopping us from celebrating the alleged beauty of the temple a the commonwealth games village self imposing itself nearby



about a kilometer away from the the temple we descended upon the edges of the farm lands





Jenson's performance involved acts of drawing ..digging sculpting arranging destroying...searching and burying...

the farmlands near akshardham falls right in the middle of our blindspot..a neglect that allows the state and the corporates to overtake these sites causing great cultural and ecological damage to the figure of an imagined city called delhi

also see http://ganjabengali.blogspot.com/2008/04/fields-off-highway-1pm30th-march.html

Hassan Al-Saidi's intervention at the improvisation session at the last day of Khoj live 08. Venue Maxmuller bhavan



it was an alternative continuation of Hassan's works done in front of Mandi house

http://ganjabengali.blogspot.com/2008/03/artmaharajs-performance.html

"I don't wont to be like this"

• In the Sunday evening, of the 30 March 2008, the closing night of the Khoj live 08, the international performance artists festival, at Goethe Institute, Max Mueller Bhawan in New Delhi, Al Saidi Hassan Iraqi artists, based Delhi did independent outdoor performance, during the open space for spontaneous performance.
• Al Saidi Hassan, in his performance express his solidarity with Iraqi people cause as their nation under the occupation forces, try to make the aoudience aware about the tragedy created by the war, said invited them to take a position in favor of the victims fo the war asked: 'one minute silence in memoirs of the victims of the occupation of Iraq' and translating it into action to support Iraqi people.
• The artist in his performance, using new medium, and out of what used, usually in Holly Khoj festival by the others artists participants (sound design, video and body movement)? Al saidi in his performance avoked the attention of the public by his provisation act, which Tipicaly personal; to create the atmosphere in the seem present moment, He started with burning incenses, and holding it in his hand, and passing between the audience and look like a purification them, with the smile and givefed of the post card, it's a digital pretend photo of self-portrait of the artist himself. As the first time the crowd see his performing with the incence burning in his hand.
• They felt with great sympathy with him, asked him, and they laughing, if he is a pandit or an Brahman!! But the artist is not a hollyman or surround himself wth many followers or singing the divin chantes in a scared place to worship or mediation as the incenses burning performance give this kind of couriosity to the public to think like this; which the artist thing as example and unique in all Khoj issue or festival, it's a changing way of what the other artists think about art performance and the medium that touse for experimenting in: also, Hassan one from many of whom were destined to performing out of Khoj… But he find the festival, represent the right platform to communicate his art with others artists as it hold together a different idea, different expression and communication, which he find it intime and space to showcase his performance 'I don't want to be like this'. Al Saidi one from the artists whom struggle against human rights violation and above, the fighting for basic civil rights and opeses the repression of the ordinary people, so he give the opportunity to others to know about him as a telanted artist, as all associated to social causes and human right, in way or other.
• Hassan, also did performance one day before; as the festival not offers space to do? It was on 23 March, 2008 and on the street, out door, lalit Kala Academy in Mandi House?
• He act in favor of those farmer's who cometed social by hanging themselves? He writing a poem on the fotbal, where the local passerby stop, stand and keep reading it… which many aprent the performance when understand what written? His performance was titled 'let me life m life', the artist express his solidarity?
• We are all chained together
Crying as I was not able to rest
They tied my hands and feet
I move ran away, but I couldnot
And I bow down to earth
And offer myself sacrifice.



fields off the highway 1pm,30th March

hi rahul it was an experience to remember working away at the dry sand mingled with ash from burnt out undergrowth. as i remember telling you the addictive nature of the performance on that day. would want to look towards the water for the next one some time. more to add with the pics...

Sunday, March 30

communication with Anil Dayanand

HI...
SORRY I CLDNT MAKE IT....I HAD TO CANCEL MY TICKET..CAZ I CLDNT FIND SOMEONE TO STAY FOR TEN DAY AT HOME..I CANT LEAVE MOM ALONE....
HOPE UR WORK IS GOING WELL...ALL THE BEST
ANIL
- Show quoted text -


On 3/28/08, rahul bhattacharya <evilareve@gmail.com> wrote:
hi

sending in the event details for the performance art cutaion can be done in any corner you like

to follow the processand concept informing this curation please visit
http://ganjabengali.blogspot.com/


find attached a pdf invite.
regards
rahul

--
rahul bhattacharya
critic+art historian

2nd floor, C-15, Green Park Extention
New Delhi-110016
----------------------------------

Reply

Forward







Your message has been sent.




show details 11:11 AM (0 minutes ago)
Reply

hi there..check the blog , things are happening well here
rahul
- Show quoted text -

Saturday, March 29

Pratul Dash's project






pratul has been growing some wheatin his studio backyard. he has planted them in word formatins fear and risk. sometime in the mid april there will be a pamphlet campaingn inviting his neighbourhood into his studio backyard for an interactive viewing project through which he intends to bring focus on the spree of farmer';s suicides ripping the agranian heartland of india.

29TH MARCH performance ...PHOTO DOCUMENTATIONS

ARTMAHARAJ'S PERFORMANCE







hASSAN'S pERFORMANCE





Title : I don't want to be like this
Duration: its limited to the artist action
Location: at Mandi House, out door, Lalit Kala Akademy
Time: in the after noon, at 5 pm
Date : Saturday, 29 March 2008

About the Perform
The perform diel with forn occupation of Iraq an the descramination and abous of the Iraqian people by the occupation forces; showen the tragedy of Iraq that keepet forget in this time, and during American election in this days.
The artist believe that no body, or force in the world can take 'Freedom' away from people, he takes a risk by using personal photograph as the poritrate's of American presidents, from one to next president, drown over their names, as he feel everyone from Iraqi people is somehow without freedom under the American occupation, also to keep the memoirs of suffering by th eoccupation in relation to American presidential election, 2008 as they are all persones, condemned others to silence by their agressivity as presidentes. So, the artists say: "I don't sant to be like this" an ordinary Iraqian without freedom ferist. And also "I don't wont to be like this" as diabolical, an American president with acts of duplicity second. In the perform, the artist us a Digital selfportrait photo, secraced and drawn over with Ink craon and acrylic color; its supported by physical action, to rend the performance a live peform in his contemporary life art practice, it's a kind of manifestation in supporting freedom.

About the Artist
Al Saidi Hassan, Iraqi origin, based in Delhi artist, born in Baghdad, and educated in Rome, Italy

for the 30th march




jenson will be doing doing something in the in the agricultural lands between akshardham temple and Nizzamudin flyover. the performance will take place on the 1 pm of the 30th .
jenson does not know what he is doing
we are all meeting Jenson in fron of the akshardham temple at 12.30 pm

Friday, March 28

inauguration





after attemts to find corners inside the Old delhi station, the corner for the inauguration ceremony took place at a deserted car park in the station premises. a stubborn candel was lit to formalise the informal.

a bad vdo of the concept note reading is available at
www.youtube.com/swf/l.swf?video_id=vFUfvnDCoQQ&rel=1&eurl=&iurl=http%3A//i.ytimg.com/vi/vFUfvnDCoQQ/default.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskI-WGOGSuNuf6_sCFfA_mK9

a better vdo will be uploaded soon.

event listings : changes


the inauguration ceremony took place at a deserted car park in the station premises. a stubborn candel was lit to formalise the informal.

mithu Sen's performance is now to be held on the 2nd of april...wednesday

Artmaharaj: INSECURITY GUARD'S tie was castrated during his performance at the anant art gallery as a part of Khoj live.
today at 4 pm, he will tie the castrated tie on the gates of the british council ( kasturba gandhi road-Connaught Place), and hold on the railings...waiting to be rescued. date : 29th march 2008

Hassan Al-Saidi will do a performance in mandi house on the 29th evening...a small act directed towards focussing attention towards the spree of farmer's suicides ripping the heartland of india. 5.00 pm . mandi house lawns. date : 29th march

Wednesday, March 26

performances: when where and why





asim will no longer be climbing a deserted monument at the barakhamba road




date and time un known

http://blindspot-delhi.blogspot.com/



artmaharaj will be performing as insecurity guard for 1 hour every evening outside the venues of the KhojLive 08 http://khojworkshop.org/blog/khoj_live_08





mithu sen will make an attempt to flight ....inviting passerbys to tie ballons on her, the artist will make an attempt to fly and clean to top of india gate as it is a site where many important dignitatries visit and is probably one place which has never been swept.

time the evening of 29th march...venue india gate



jenson will be doing doing something in the in the agricultural lands near nizzamuddin flyover. the performance will take place on the noon of the 30th .
jenson does not know what he is doing


Hassan Al-Saidi will do a performance in mandi house on the 29th evening...a small act directed towards focussing attention towards the spree of farmer's suicides ripping the heartland of india.




more posts to be uploaded soon

Friday, March 21

a mail sent to communicate the curation

the email was sent to
shivji panikkar , parul , deeptha.achar@gmail.com, Phoebe Wong , janet chan ,
Claire Hsu , Pooja Sood ,
nandini manjrekar , geetakapur@gmail.com,
jayaram poduval , "Mr. Rajiv Lochan"

hi,
Sending in a link to a project i have initiated, http://ganjabengali.blogspot.com/2008/02/concept-note.html. its an attemt to re position Performance Art at a time when it is increasingly becoming intergal to the mainstream.
the link will take you to concept note, please navigate to get the full essense of the nature of activity shaping up.
regards
rahul

hassan's performance art bio

Al Saidi Hassan has done many performances and prominent among them are:

ADAM FEET, 2008, a live performance at Anant Art Center, Noida, UP.

Freedom Of Expression 2007, a live performance, Graffiti on the Walls, at Vadhere Art Gallery, Okhla, New Delhi.

Death Penalty, 2007, a live performance at Khoj-2007, Khirki Village, New Delhi.

The Loss OF Innocent Civilians’Life In The War, a live performance 2006, at Private T. Larech House, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi.

Game Of Power, Video Performance, 2006, at Take Hiro Noguchi, Private House, (Party Hosted For Khoj Artists), Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi.

The Haditha Massacre 2006, a live performance, at Private T. Larech House, Lajpat Nagar, New Delhi.

Object Adoring My Room ( The Pharah Tomb)-1996, at Kodhahora Reef Resort, Maldives.

White Flag-1986, a live performance at Anano, Modina, Italy.

a cross posting :- Note on the discussion on Performance Art, which followed the Video presentation by Paulo Nazereth on his works khoj 2006

hi ...putting in an old write previously posted at Performance art, theory...through practice, it is a blog which i had maitainned as a critic in residence of the KHOJ 2006 performance art residency

Participants:
Pooja Sood
Paulo Nazareth
Anousha Lall
Sushil Kumar
WuYe

Rahul Bhattacharya

Paulo’s presentation an occasion for a discussion on performance art and the nature of critical theory around it. It was almost inevitable that the discussion would start using the videos shown as a springboard for raising questions. Oreet in reference to the video, which captures Paulo walking into an eatery, dressed in a suite and ‘blind folded’ by slabs of meat asked whether the suite was a symbol of any kind of power. She went on to ask how consciously Paulo worked within the realm of counterculture... especially in the context of economics and race.
Paulo consciously chose not to go in for a direct reply and instead threw in a reply, which served as the keynote statement for the evening:
There are political people and there are artists. Work needs to be seen through different kind of windows... one can also engage with the form.”
One could sense a feeling of surprise as Paulo’s translator Mirea made his statement available in English. I guess the manner in which we had looked at his work nearly ‘limited’ it to being ‘political’ and ‘activistic’ and in a certain sense failed to understand his formal plays.
Pooja stepped into the moderators’ role...turned to Oreet: “Where is your Art coming from”
Oreet: “well it comes from my interst in social realities...especially crossings between feminism and sexuality”
Pooja: “where does your take on sexuality come from”
I expected Oreet to give a concise ‘self history’...her experience in Israel, especially as a weapons trainer in the army, questions of marriage and the encounters with her sexual orientations.
Don’t know if Oreet caught the question right...she went on to give an account of various takes on sexuality done within the context of ‘Performance’. She then proceeded to express a concern about performance becoming ‘too mainstream’, and how over the ten-fifteen years it has really become ‘fashionable’ to have ‘Performances’ at various Art show openings. Oreet further observed that the proliferation of ‘reality TV’ shows has made ‘Performance’ mainstream even within popular culture and maybe in a certain way this has diluted the radical possibilities of Performance.
At this point Pooja tuned to Diane and asked for her take on the discussion so far.
Diane: “I have done a lot of collaborative work”
She went on to give an interesting account of a development within ‘Performance’ which focuses on group collaborations and centers around marginalized geographical groups and spaces. Influenced by Guy Debord’s Society of the Spectacle, and other critical texts centered on alienation of social experience, a form of Performance has developed wherein a group gathers in a socially invisible geographic space, enact a ‘ritual’ and suddenly vanish, but through enactment of the meeting resist and possibly subvert the culture of ‘alienated consumption of the spectacle’ which has been dominating our social experience. Diane went on to suggest that a city like Delhi provided a rich ground fro such ‘Performances’
I have my own takes on Guy Debord’s text and the euro centric Marxist bias that it encodes. For me both the ‘spectacle’ and ‘alienation’ have their own pre modern and non ‘Occidental’ histories and I felt that that the ‘marginalized/vanishing geographical spaces’ project sounded like that it can lapse into being a tokenistic romantic engagement with the past...casting it in a certain mould of purity. Moreover the project may have its own relevance within the context of Europe’s negotiations with modernity. However to assume that the project would have a similar relevance in the Indian context seemed very problematic.
As I was trying to make this point through the thunder of a low flying air craft, Oreet made came in with an interesting observation about the ‘counter economics’ of being a performance artist.
Touching back upon her earlier comment about Performance becoming (too) mainstream, Oreet:
“A lot of really strong performance art survives due to different kinds of networks of small artists supporting each other and this mode of linking also facilitates a lot of crossovers”
She further went on to express serious misgivings about the manner in which performance art is written about, and how art criticism is struggling to write about Performance. Mentioning the 80’s Oreet sited the coinage of the term ‘Live Art’ to ‘release performance art from the disciplinary limitations arising out of the links between ‘Performance’ and ‘Performing’. Continuing to voice concern over critical writing on performance art, Oreet referred to the birth of ‘relational aesthetics’, which as a response to ‘high modernistFormalism seeks to ‘value’ works of art on the basis of their contextual role-playing and the semantic significance of such in the realm of social relationships. She went on to observe that in the recent times ‘relational aesthetics’ has come in for its share of revisionalism and there has been a certain (ill understood) going back to ‘form’.
Sonia came in to comment:
the manner in which Performance has/is being suddenly co-opted has had an adverse effect on critical theory”
She reminded us of the voice claim proclaiming loudly across New York and London, claiming Performance as the art of the 21st century. Sonia went on to pose a polemical question as to what happens to the contextual nature of Performance when it enters the Tate Modern.
The discussion was taking interesting turns...in a residency held in the context of Performance having a marginal space within artistic practices in India; suddenly there was a burst of lament about a certain loss experienced in Euro-American circles over Performance loosing its subversive potential by becoming too mainstream.
This stream of thought was temporarily broken,
Diane: “Performance Art allows you an immediate way to make a statement”
Anousha: “The definition of Performance is dominated by visual artists”
...Referring to the dominant trend of using performance towards making political/positional statements...she went on to say:
“It seems as if there is a need for a manifesto”
Diane: “visual art is very imperialistic with terminologies...
But actually there are various different impulses coming in from dance that have a significant role to play on how the history of performance has shaped up.”
She referred Merce Cunningham’s collaboration with John Cage as an early endeavor from within the realms of dance to de-establish the disciplinary understandings of dance...and a significant moment in the history of performance.
Anita: there is very little space sub-cultures get inside the elitist definition of performance.”
She went on to express in the possible languages of performance...further stating that as a visual artist she was drawn towards performance as a medium that facilitates a certain nature of immediacy in reaction and enables her to express ‘spontaneously’.
At this point Pooja raised a question about the kind of background performance artists came from.
Oreet: “Performance artists come in from very difficult back grounds”
Diane: “what about the possibilities of political engagement through performance in India”
Pooja: “in the context of theater India has a rich tradition of political engagement especially IPTA...and we also have history of political activism through street theater...”
Oreet: “Globally art is going through its most conservative phase”
Paulo: “In Brazil older artists have a way too activistic definition of performance, and they recognize only a very loudly political pieces as being good performance”
Paulo again managed to surprise us all...all of us were still viewing his works chiefly within the category of ‘political’. However Paulo has a great knack for making people stop and think...and then think again. I suddenly realized that Paulo’s statements were leading me to better appreciate the poetic quality of his pieces...their layered levels of metaphor use.
At this point Anita and I started marveling about Latin American and Chinese performance and how artists like Song Dong, Danniel Sariva or Paulo make stunningly strong political commentary trough the use of highly poetic acts...minimal production backup...often enacted in isolated environments and documented (dramatically) in video.
Soon it became absolutely impossible to take notes as the discussion broke up into pockets of cross exchanges. The discussion that stayed on with me started with Anousha revisiting Anita’s earlier statements about sub-cultures and their space within the discourse of performance.
Anousha however, framed it combining Anita’s statement with her concerns about the discourse around Performance being Euro-American in its conceptual framework that while sketching a narrative about performance in India, we tend to ignore various traditional forms of Performance.
Catching up with Anousha, Anita reiterated her discomfort regarding the mainstream definition of Performance, and how one should get into dialectical relationships with the etinic/traditional forms of Performance...and try and be able to define it as Performance.
Sushil had walked in a while ago and was trying to understand the various strands of conversations floating around the space. He joined in with Anousha to voice extreme discomfort with what came across as Anita’s desire to voice extreme discomfort with what came across as Anita’s desire to appropriate various sets of scattered practices under the umbrella of ‘Performance’.
This ‘attack’ forced Anita to clarify her stance and probably rethink a bit. She expressed her desire to work with the various (sub-altern) forms of Performance, use their formal approach and radicalize them in terms of contemporary notions of subversion. She mentioned that Sushil and she were planning a Performance chanting the Ram Charit Manas or rather using the form of Ram Charit Manas, but using pornographic or politically subversive textual input.
Though I kind of understood what Anita was getting at...but we have to be very careful/sensitive about the imperialistic appropriative tendencies of High Art practices. Anita’s internationality definitely has a great relevance within the discourse of High Art. However that evening, the discussion was centered on revisiting the definition of Performance and some of us sitting there celebrate Performance as a medium, which has the potential to break the boundaries of ‘high’ and ‘popular’ within artistic practice...and as a praxis, which radically redefines art. Therefore it is only natural that we would be very sensitive to any urge, which suggested any reiteration of the ‘high’ and ‘popular’ divide; and also threatens to decontextualise practices which have very strong histories of their own.
By this time Rohini and Aastha had also joined the group.... somehow a certain strand of the discussion went back to gender and Performance...someone (I think Diane) made a remark about the video presentation and discussion which took place a few days ago featuring the works of Shantanu Lodh and Mrs Manmeet & Inder Salim, and where artists are invited to share a significant artwork and or an aspect of their practice, followed by open discussion with the audience. All of us have/had very strong opinions on their works...and very soon there was complete anarchy.... the ‘discussion’ eventually broke up....but even as it did I remember Rohini’s voice coming out strongest.......................................................................................................................




[1] Hope it does not come across that I am proposing a absolute duality between the ‘poetic’ and the ‘political’